Learning Content and Theses

Platform for digital learning at HSHL

Measurement Uncertainty

When we measure the length of the table with the folding rule, we first have to look at the length of the folding rule we are measuring with. A folding rule has a specified uncertainty of ±1 mm in its length. So folding rules are between l = 1.999 m and l = 2.001 m long. At first, we do not know how long the folding rule actually is. Nor do we know whether it is too long or too short, which is why we state the interval with “±”.

If we trust the manufacturer that the length of the folding rule lies within its specification, we can only say with certainty that it is at least l = 1.999 m and at most l = 2.001 m long. If we measure the length of the table with this folding rule of unknown length, the measurement result is just as uncertain as the measurement uncertainty – here the length uncertainty – of the measuring instrument.

Of course, we can use a precision measuring instrument to measure how long a folding rule is. But the precision instrument itself is not arbitrarily accurate either. Suppose the precision instrument itself has an uncertainty of ±100 µm; then we know the length of the folding rule afterwards with an uncertainty of ±100 µm. Our folding rule in the example is l = 2.0005 m long. We always state the measurement uncertainty with measurement results. That is why we would give the length of this folding rule as l = 2.0005 m ± 100 µm. Everyone can then understand how certain we are about the statement. The true length of the folding rule could therefore also be 2.0004 m or 2.0006 m.

Because we now know that the folding rule is 0.5 mm too long, we correct this known measurement deviation in every result we determine. So we measure a table and read off, for example, l = 2 m. Then we know that the table is actually 2.0005 m long. And we know that, after this correction, measurement results with the folding rule only have an uncertainty of ±100 µm.

For high-quality measurement technology, the measurement uncertainty of a measurement system is stated in the data sheet.

To prove in a folding-rule factory that the folding rules have a maximum length uncertainty of ±1 mm, a reference system with a measurement uncertainty of at most ±100 µm is necessary. In practice, to prove a measurement uncertainty, a measuring instrument must be about a factor of 10 more accurate than the instrument whose accuracy is to be verified. Of course, you can also use more accurate reference systems; then the proof of your measurement system's uncertainty is even more reliable. The next chapter deals with the reference systems for verifying measurement results.

Download course as PDF

The PDF contains all pages of the course. Interactive content is only available on the website.